But I truly believe -and comments on various courses have proven that chessable should add support for reading a course, not only training it. I agree that chessable's main role is training moves and not reading books like forward chess for example. Some might say "hey man, chessable is for training moves not reading books, go read somewhere else". Characteristic examples of this are Gelfand's book, Chess Structures book etc. What I'm talking about is reading a course like one would read a book. There's also room for improvement in that aspect for sure. I'm not talking about training moves etc. Okay since we've settled this, I hate to say that chessable is really bad for reading.
On the contrary, it's an expression of love and a (gentle) push to reach perfection. Why am I saying all this? Because I want to note as early as possible that what I am about to write is not an expression of dislike or bad feeling towards the site. I've taken part in some beta testing processes, took part in the early MT 2.0 beta and as my current streak can prove (534 at the moment of writing this) and the courses I've bought (admins can probably see even the archive), I enjoy this site very much. Hello, I've been a chessable pro user for nearly 2 years now and been using chessable as one of my main training tools.
0 kommentar(er)
